My Google Page Rank

Lawmakers to CHR: Denounce human rights abuses of criminals

PDFPrintE-mail

Members of the House of Representatives took turns in decrying the way the Commission on Human Rights (CHR) has been performing its role as protectors of human rights.

The lawmakers expressed  dismay at the CHR during the hearing on the agency’s proposed budget for 2018 conducted by the House committee on appropriations chaired by Rep. Karlo Alexei Nograles (1st District, Davao City).

The CHR proposed a budget of P1.23 billion, up from this year’s budget of P749 million. However, the Department of Budget and Management (DBM) slashed the CHR proposed budget to only P678 million.

During the hearing, lawmakers lamented that the CHR, led by its chairman Jose Luis “Chito” Gascon, is quick to denounce alleged human rights violations committed by law enforcement agencies, but is noticeably quiet on the human rights abuses perpetrated by criminals or terrorists.

House Speaker Pantaleon Alvarez even recommended a zero budget to CHR due to the alleged incompetence and lapses of its chairman.

Congressman Celso Lobregat (1st District, Zamboanga City) stressed that the CHR’s mandate is to promote and protect human rights, adding that the agency should denounce human rights violations whether they are committed by the state or not.

Lobregat noted that the CHR did not condemn the perpetrators in the Zamboanga siege, Maguindanao massacre, Mamasapano carnage, Marawi attack, beheading of soldiers, and even kidnapping.

“Everytime there is a violation of human rights perpetrated by terrorists or private armies, there is no condemnation by the CHR, unlike when there is a seemingly human rights violation committed by agents of the State,” Lobregat said.

He said that while the CHR and the mandate of promoting and protecting human rights should be apolitical, the CHR is perceived to be very political.

“They (CHR) choose only to criticize the human rights record of the current administration and they remain silent on the human rights record of the past dispensation,” said Lobregat.

He pointed out that the CHR is perceived by the public as a political tool against the Duterte administration.

Lobregat said the CHR’s mindset that it was created as an equalizer against a superior authority needs to be changed, as some of the enemies of the State now are more superior than the sovereign authority.

“When the State is being attacked by a group or industry, the Commission must also act upon it.”

Lobregat said, the CHR should be non-partisan, adding that biases and partiality should take a back seat in the interest of the people. (Dexter Yap)




Related news items:
Newer news items:
Older news items:

Add comment


Security code
Refresh